Public Homebrew Announcement
When cleaning or replacing your beverage lines always make sure that you tighten the connection or this could be you:
That is all…
Public Homebrew Announcement
When cleaning or replacing your beverage lines always make sure that you tighten the connection or this could be you:
That is all…
When brewing the previous incarnation of my house saison, I had used the more trusty and beastly Wyeast 3711 French Saison strain which will, in the words of the internet, “it could ferment out an old gym sock”. True to the claims a fast and furious fermentation ended in 7 days leaving me with nothing but 1.000 S.G tasty saison. While it tasted very good and went over quite well I was still looking for something with a bit more spice. To me this meant using Wyeast 3724, the Dupont yeast strain.
The Dupont yeast strain provides a classic saison beer flavor, taste and aroma, including that special spiciness that I so desired. It almost seems like a no-brainer to use 3724, so why wouldn’t I just use that. 3724 can deliver all of these great characteristics but the actual use of this yeast during fermentation can be nerve-racking. A simple search of homebrew forums will yield many pages of “stuck fermentation” and hitting the 3724 “bump” at 1.030 S.G. I was well aware of these posts. I’ve read Farmhouse Ales from cover to cover twice, paying particular attention to the Dupont section that specifically discusses how best to handle fermenting with the strain. I felt well equipped to finally tackle this yeast.
I started fermentation on the cool side, around 70F… Slowly ramped the temp up into the high 70s, around 78F. I held this temp for about 2 weeks. Vigorous fermentation and the yeast eventually dropped out. I wasn’t worried; the schedule in Farmhouse Ales showed that most times, 3724 was fully attenuated in just 2 weeks. I pulled the first sample and before I even put in the hydrometer, I knew it wasn’t done. The beer poured thick and was very opaque, smelling way too sweet to be a dry, 1.004 S.G beer yet. I was crushed when I read 1.045 on the hydrometer, down from 1.066.
Beaten, but not broken, I pulled my first trick out of my sleeve. My fermwrap, temp controller was applied and I cranked the temp up into the mid 80s, around 85F. Two weeks past and progress was made; though only down to 1.030 S.G. I didn’t hesitate, and pushed the temp up to 90F, the upper limits of this yeast. At 5 weeks, I had dropped to 1.029 S.G. I was sure the temp would get things going again, but it hadn’t moved at all.
During this time, I had been swirling the carboy to help suspend the yeast, but that’s just not that effective. So I put together a simple device to rouse the yeast more effectively. I actually had thought of this when doing dry-hopping. Listening to one of the Brewing Network shows on cloning Avery’s Maharajah, Adam Avery was stressing the importance of hop contact time with the wort and he disclosed that at Avery they inject CO2 into the bottom of the fermenter to push up any dropped hops to ensure a good mix and contact between the hop and the beer. My guess was that this would also be a good technique for re-suspending yeast.
I used my 1/4″ air line from my CO2 tank and loosely fitted it over a plastic racking cane that had been sanitized. After starting the CO2 flow, I then lower the rod into the carboy. Pushing the rod to the bottom, I scrapped and turned until the entire wort was cloudy once again with yeast. At week 6, the S.G dropped to 1.018. Success! Another week and rousing to reach 1.009.
Finally, at 8 weeks, we’ve hit terminal gravity. 1.001 S.G at 90F adjusts to 1.004. Not bad. And it was completely worth the wait. The amount of complexity in the flavor this time is just amazing. The dry finish has just the amount of spice I like and the honey aroma is still present. I’m very much looking forward to this 3rd version.
For v4, I plan to keep the same fermentation schedule, but this time, I’ll start re-suspending the yeast as soon as I notice it drop out.
I’ve brewed two recipes now that have used a sour mashing technique. The first was a Berliner Weiss from a recipe provided by Black Star Coop. I ran into their Waterloo at the Austin Homebrew Supply store anniversary party a few years back and was hooked on the easy-drinking, sour beer. The second was a Belgian Double Wit, Licensed Fool
The general technique for souring a mash is well known: keep your mash temp warm for 12 to 24 hours after you’ve completed the normal mash schedule for the beer. This extended time and heat allow the biological bugs that reside on the surface of the grain to consume the sugars and multiply which in turn generate various souring compounds, like lactic acid from Lactobacillus.
I’ve heard many stories about how “sick” homebrewer’s beer became during this time as well as the terrible smell. I can attest to this roadkill aroma as I’ve bagged up still-hot grains from a mash and left it in the trashcan. The stench overwhelmed the garage and a new cleanup technique was born. I now remove the liquid and let the grains cool before tossing them in the can.
As I studied number threads on sour mashing on homebrewtalk.com and other articles I wondered if there was a cleaner way to get the sour flavors without risking the whole beer, or even a sour starter which can still be hit or miss. It turns out that, of course, there is a safer way.
Instead of letting the bugs on the grains infect either a starter or your mash we infect the wort with a specific bug, Lactobacillus, but we need to ensure that this is the dominate bug and nothing else can spoil the wort. A simple post-mash pasteurization is performed by heating the drained wort up to 176F and then chilling back down to 120F before pitching a vial of Lactobacillus from White Labs.
There are a few more details needed to ensure good lactic production. First, Lactobacillus are anaerobic, so removing as much oxygen from the environment promotes their grown and keeps other bad bugs (say Acetobacter) from taking hold. The best method I’ve seen for this is to flush the surface of the wort in your pot with CO2, and then covering with foil, plastic wrap, or a sealed kettle lid.
The other critical step is keeping the temperature at 120F without going too high or low. Many homebrewers use ice chest or water chests as mash tuns which have lots of insulation. These vessels tend to hold their heat well over time, but not so well over the multiple days needed for lactic production. This can be addressed with hot water infusions but this dilutes your wort.
Instead I chose to use my heatbelt setup typically reserved for fermentation temp control. My first sour mash occurred during the winter months so I wasn’t sure if two heat belts and some blankets would be enough in the cold garage, however that was fully sufficient. I’ve since upgraded the heatbelts (longer) and added an infrared layer so I can keep heat on my 20 Gallon Blichmann pots which will be needed when I do a 10 Gallon batch of Berliner Weiss.
If the sour mash goes well, then you’ll be presented with a nice, tart-smelling and funky wort. A top layer may form on the surface of the beer. The pelicle forms to protect the bacteria. You can remove it or ignore it. I ended up racking around it.
I also like to check the pH of the wort. As the souring level increases the pH will drop. My first Berliner Weiss I let sour for 3 days and ended up at around 4.0. My second sour brew went for the same time and got close, around 4.2.
Equipment List
42 Quart Aluminum Pot with Lid
6′ Heat tape Belt
11″x17″ Infrared Head Pad
Johnson A419 Digital Temp Controller
pH Meter
Auto-siphon for use only with Sour Beers
It was probably a few years ago when I first encountered Boulevard Brewing’s Two Jokers Double-Wit style beer. And in one or two sips, I was hooked along with a few of my fellow craft beer drinkers. My friends were aware that I had started brewing and so the obvious question of whether or not I could clone the beer was proposed. At the time, I had taken my hand at brewing a number of existing clones with great success, usually from the Brewing Network’s The Jamil Show (Can You Brew it) podcast show. One thing I had not yet done was to attempt to clone a beer myself.
Brewing with Wheat includes interviews with Boulevard’s head brewer and he discusses a number of the beers as well as a few details on Two Jokers. Using these tidbits along with a general ingredient list available on their website, I’ve taken a stab at what I think the recipe should look like.
One interesting aspect is that in the book, Boulevard says that they do short sour mash. They dough-in at 95F, hold for 8 hours and target a pH of 4.8. I really liked this idea and re-used the sour mashing technique I used to create a Berliner Weiss, which I picked up from Jeff Young at Black Star Coop via the Sunday Show interview with them. I’m looking forward to seeing how this extra tartness goes with the Belgian Wit recipe.
Batch Size | Boil Time | IBU | SRM | Est. OG | Est. FG | ABV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.3 gal | 60 min | 16.3 IBUs | 5.1 SRM | 1.075 | 1.013 | 8.1 % |
Actuals | 1.046 | 1.01 | 4.7 % |
Name | Cat. | OG Range | FG Range | IBU | SRM | Carb | ABV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Witbier | 16 A | 1.044 - 1.052 | 1.008 - 1.012 | 10 - 20 | 2 - 4 | 2.4 - 2.9 | 4.5 - 5.5 % |
Name | Amount | % |
---|---|---|
Brewer's Malt, 2-Row, Premium (Great Western) | 8.5 lbs | 56.43 |
White Wheat Malt | 3.314 lbs | 22 |
Wheat, Flaked | 2.937 lbs | 19.5 |
Munich Malt | 5 oz | 2.07 |
Name | Amount | Time | Use | Form | Alpha % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Magnum | 0.18 oz | 60 min | Boil | Pellet | 13.5 |
Northern Brewer (AHS) | 0.5 oz | 15 min | Boil | Pellet | 9 |
Lavender | 0.5 oz | 15 min | Aroma | Pellet | 12.2 |
Name | Amount | Time | Use | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
Calcium Chloride | 4.80 g | 60 min | Mash | Water Agent |
Gypsum (Calcium Sulfate) | 4.80 g | 60 min | Mash | Water Agent |
Epsom Salt (MgSO4) | 0.50 g | 60 min | Mash | Water Agent |
Cardimom | 2.00 g | 30 min | Boil | Spice |
Coriander Seed | 0.50 oz | 15 min | Boil | Spice |
Orange Peel, Sweet | 0.50 oz | 15 min | Boil | Spice |
Seeds of Paradise | 0.70 g | 5 min | Boil | Spice |
Name | Lab | Attenuation | Temperature |
---|---|---|---|
Belgian Witbier (3944) | Wyeast Labs | 74% | 62°F - 75°F |
Step | Temperature | Time |
---|---|---|
Saccharification | 148°F | 90 min |
Mash Out | 168°F | 10 min |
Color (EBC) 15.8 Bitterness (IBUs) 15 Original Gravity (Plato) 17.5 Terminal Gravity (Plato) 3.8 Alcohol (ABV) 8% CO2 - Bottles 3.5 vol. (7.0 g/L) CO2 - Kegs N/A Sour Mash - purge mash tun with c02 - mash in at 95F, hold for 8 hours until pH at 4.8 - add lactic and citric for target pH |
Download this recipe's BeerXML file |
Not included in the pretty-print form of the recipe is the Spices … I’m actually working on a patch to the beerxml wordpress plugin to display Misc. items in the recipe. But if you download the recipe directly, it’s all in the XML. Also, You’ll note Lavender listed as a hop; this is purely because Beersmith doesn’t let me say Spices steep after the boil which is what the BYO Brewing with Spices article discusses.
A few weeks ago I got results back from the Alamo City Cerveza Fest. I was looking forward to these results for a number of reasons, one being just because of all of the drama. The other was a different set of opinions about Big Fat Phony, a beer that we infused with peaty Scotch. And finally, I had sent in an IPA of mine that originally I wasn’t so sure of, but in the past couple of weeks before sending had really turned into something quite nice.
That I didn’t place with it wasn’t much of a surprise. Instead, I take solace in collecting the feedback so I can focus on making better beers, more so than any desire to win a competition. On my score sheet however was something I was pretty shocked to read. A very noticable flaw, diacetyl. That lovely aroma of movie theater butter popcorn. Most folks can pick it up a mile away; and it’s detectable at very light levels, in the parts-per-billion. And here on my score sheet, two judges pick it up. One of them even says that it’s over-shadowing the rest of the beer. Wow.
I was completely stunned and crushed. I’ve been drinking this beer since it was kegged with not a hint in sight. But that’s not always good enough. In many cases the beer can have diacetyl precursors which once exposed to warm temperatures and oxygen can reform into diacetyl. Strugging with this possiblility I wondered how I could find out without bottling and waiting two weeks.
It turns out that diacetyl levels are actually a really good indicators of fermentation progress. In the fermentation process diacetyl levels increase during yeast growth phase. Near the end of fermentation, gravity reduction has ceased, but the yeast are still working to finish up, and consume many of the by-products (such as diacetyl) that were produced earlier in fermentation. If you can test and detect diacetyl levels (usually done via gas chromotography in a lab) then you can know for certain when the yeast are “done”.
As a homebrewer we don’t usually have access to $40,000 equipment, but we can perform a test that can help determine if diacetyl or pre-cursors are present. I decided that I needed to use this to test if my IPA was harboring some skanky butter aroma. The test itself is simple.
Pour two samples of the beer into glasses and cover (foil or plastic wrap). Prepare a pot of water that one of the samples can sit in and heat up to 140F to 160F and hold for 10 to 20 minutes. Then place the hot sample in a basin of ice water to chill it back down to the same temperature as the unheated sample.
After removing the cover of the two samples assess if either sample contains the dreaded butter aroma. If the cold sample is affected, then trivially the hot sample will and the beer needs more time with the yeast. If only the heated sample does, then the beer has diacetyl.
I never did detect anything in my beer… better luck next time I guess.